Off the Path and Frustratrated

I’m supposed to be writing about creating believable antagonists today, but I need a break to talk about something else. I’m totally frustrated. Here’s why:

I finished reading a book today, but the story didn’t end. Now I have to wait at least a year before the book continues. I’m not talking about a single cliff-hanger, where the main story is neatly wrapped up but something juts out at the end (screaming “SEQUEL”!). I’m talking about a Nothing Got Solved type of ending. It’s obvious that the author had a huge story, maybe 600,000 words long (no exaggeration) and just decided to split it into two at the mid-point.

What makes it worse is that this author is notorious for writing trilogies, and the book I finished today is book 3. I thought it’d be all wrapped up neatly, all those dangling plot points from the first two books would have resolution, the good guys would win (but with scars), the bad guys would lose (maybe even their lives), and I’d be satisfied.

Nope. This author didn’t write a trilogy this time, she wrote a “chronicles” – which could mean that even book 4 doesn’t wrap up the story. Why did she do that? Why did she take the risk of ticking off her fans by giving us HALF a book? Granted, it was a billion pages long, but it didn’t tell a complete story. It set up a complete story, to be finished in the next book (or the one after that), but at the end of book 3, all these plots points were converging BUT NEVER MET!

In every writing book I’ve studied, there’s the rule that goes something like this: TELL ONE STORY PER BOOK. Even if it’s a series, each book must stand alone. It must introduce a protagonist who wants something, an antagonist who stands in the protagonists way, and a resolution to that conflict. It’s a good structure. It’s what readers expect.
So I’m wondering how this veteran author, with a boat-load of books to her name, could pull such a stunt? It’s Just Not Right. Do you agree with me, or am I overreacting?


One thought on “Off the Path and Frustratrated

  1. Not knowing the author or the book, I wonder if she’s so well established that no editor dare tell her to cut the darn thing in half? Then there’s George R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones books which not only end in cliffhangers, but subsequent volumes often fail to take up plot lines from the previous volume. His books are best sellers. So again his status as a writer may allow him to break the rules. For the rest of us, I think your rule is all most of us can handle.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s